Needs assessment of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major haemorrhage: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can be used as an adjunct treatment in traumatic abdominopelvic haemorrhage, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), gastrointestinal bleeding and iatrogenic injuries during surgery. This needs assessment study aims to determine the number of patients eligible for REBOA in a typical Norwegian population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on data obtained from blood bank registries and the Norwegian Trauma Registry for the years 2017-2018. Patients who received ≥4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within 6 hours and met the anatomical criteria for REBOA or patients with relevant Abbreviated Injury Scale codes with concurrent hypotension or transfusion of ≥4 units of PRBCs within 6 hours were identified. A detailed two-step chart review was performed to identify potentially eligible REBOA candidates. Descriptive data were collected and compared between subgroups using non-parametric tests for statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 804 patients eligible for inclusion, 53 patients were regarded as potentially REBOA eligible (corresponding to 5.7 per 100 000 adult population/year). Of these, 19 actually received REBOA. Among the identified eligible patients, 44 (83%) had a non-traumatic aetiology. Forty-two patients (79%) were treated at a tertiary care hospital. Fourteen (78%) of the REBOA procedures were due to PPH. CONCLUSION: The number of patients potentially eligible for REBOA after haemorrhage is low, and most cases are non-traumatic. Most patients were treated at a tertiary care hospital. The exclusion of non-traumatic patients results in a substantial underestimation of the number of potentially REBOA-eligible patients.

Direct quantitative assessment of the peripheral artery collateral circulation in patients undergoing angiography.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that numerous studies have pursued the strategy of improving collateral function in patients with peripheral artery disease, there is currently no method available to quantify collateral arterial function of the lower limb. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp, calculated as (occlusive pressure-central venous pressure)/(aortic pressure-central venous pressure); pressure values in mm Hg) of the left superficial femoral artery was obtained in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography using a combined pressure/Doppler wire (n=30). Distal occlusive pressure and toe oxygen saturation (Sao2) were measured for 5 minutes under resting conditions, followed by an exercise protocol (repetitive plantar-flexion movements in supine position; n=28). In all patients, balloon occlusion of the superficial femoral artery over 5 minutes was painless under resting conditions. CFIp increased during the first 3 minutes from 0.451±0.168 to 0.551±0.172 (P=0.0003), whereas Sao2 decreased from 98±2% to 93±7% (P=0.004). Maximal changes of Sao2 were inversely related to maximal CFIp (r(2)=0.33, P=0.003). During exercise, CFIp declined within 1 minute from 0.560±0.178 to 0.393±0.168 (P<0.0001) and reached its minimum after 2 minutes of exercise (0.347±0.176), whereas Sao2 declined to a minimum of 86±6% (P=0.002). Twenty-five patients (89%) experienced pain or cramps/tired muscles, whereas 3 (11%) remained symptom-free for an occlusion time of 10 minutes. CFIp values were positively related to the pain-free time span (r(2)=0.50, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitatively assessed collateral arterial function at rest determined in the nonstenotic superficial femoral artery is sufficient to prevent ischemic symptoms during a total occlusion of 5 minutes. During exercise, there is a decline in CFIp that indicates a supply-demand mismatch via collaterals or, alternatively, a steal phenomenon. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT01742455.

Stunning and cumulative left ventricular dysfunction occurs late after coronary balloon occlusion in humans insights from simultaneous coronary and left ventricular hemodynamic assessment.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular (LV) stunning could be detected late after coronary occlusion when coronary flow has normalized. BACKGROUND: Stunning and cumulative LV dysfunction after ischemia reperfusion has been clearly demonstrated in animal models but has been refuted in several angioplasty models in humans. However, these studies have assessed LV function early, during the reactive hyperemic phase, which might have augmented LV function. METHODS: We recruited 20 male subjects with single-vessel, type A coronary disease, and normal ventricular function. We simultaneously measured LV function with a conductance catheter and coronary flow velocity with a Combowire (Volcano Therapeutics, Inc., Rancho Cordova, California) at baseline (BL), for 30 s after a low-pressure coronary balloon occlusion for 1 min and again after 30 min, before a second balloon occlusion. RESULTS: Stunning was detected at 30 min after a 1-min balloon occlusion: stroke volume (ml) BL1: 88.4 (22.8) versus BL2: 79.4 (24.0), p = 0.04; tau (ms) BL1: 49.8 (9.0) versus BL2: 52.5 (8.9), p = 0.02, despite full recovery of coronary average peak velocity (p = 0.62). A second balloon occlusion caused cumulative LV dysfunction: stroke volume (ml) BO1: 77.3 (34.6) versus BO2 64.9 (22.9), p = 0.01. Reactive hyperemia significantly augmented early recovery systolic function: dP/dt max 30 s: +5.8% versus 30 min - 5.4%, p = 0.0009. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary occlusion for 1-min results in late stunning and cumulative LV dysfunction after 30 min. Reactive hyperemia augments stunned LV systolic function in early recovery.

Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect: is the risk of heart block too high a price?

The late development of heart block in paediatric patients following device closure of a perimembranous ventricular septal defect may be a cause for concern.